Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (deepseek-v4-pro + claude-sonnet-5)audited 2026-08-17
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Assuming Choice, any two algebraic closures are base-isomorphic

Statement

Assuming the Axiom of Choice, any two algebraic closures of a field F are F-isomorphic. No uniqueness of the isomorphism is asserted.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice and two algebraic closures Ω1/F and Ω2/F.

[L1]

Assuming Choice, a base embedding into an algebraically closed field extends across an algebraic extension (Assuming Choice, a base-field embedding extends across every algebraic extension).

[L2]

An algebraic closure is algebraic over its base and algebraically closed (An algebraic closure of a field).

[L3]

Every algebraic element has a monic irreducible minimal polynomial over the base (The evaluation kernel and the unique monic irreducible minimal polynomial of an algebraic element).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Extend the identity embedding of F across Ω1/F into Ω2 by [L1], obtaining an F-embedding σ:Ω1Ω2.

L1L2
2.1

Its image E=σ(Ω1) is algebraically closed because it is isomorphic to Ω1. Every bΩ2 is algebraic over FE, so [L3] gives a minimal polynomial over E; this polynomial has a root in E, and irreducibility then makes it linear. Hence bE.

step 1.1L2L3
3.1

Thus σ is surjective as well as injective, and is an F-isomorphism. The argument proves existence only and makes no uniqueness assertion.

step 1.1step 2.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 32 results over 6 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources