Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (deepseek-v4-pro + claude-sonnet-5)audited 2026-08-17
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Q(2,3) has four embeddings into Q

Example

The field E=Q(2,3) has degree four over Q and has four embeddings into an algebraic closure. They are the independent sign choices

(2,3)(±2,±3).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Positive real square roots 2,3 and an algebraic closure Ω/Q.

[L1]

Eisenstein's criterion proves the irreducibility of the integer polynomials used below (Eisenstein criterion over the integers).

[L2]

A simple algebraic extension has the power basis and degree of the minimal polynomial (A simple algebraic extension is its minimal-polynomial quotient and has power basis 1,a,,an1 and degree n).

[L3]

Ordinary degrees multiply in finite towers (Tower law for finite extensions: [L:F]=[L:K][K:F]).

[L4]

Embeddings of a simple extension correspond to distinct roots of its minimal polynomial (F-embeddings of F(α) into an algebraically closed field correspond to the distinct roots of mα).

[L5]

Restriction partitions embeddings in a finite tower into equal extension fibres (Restriction partitions embeddings in a finite tower into extension fibres).

[L6]

The notation F(α,β) denotes the subfield generated by the named elements (Field extensions, generated subrings F[S], generated subfields F(S), and simple extensions).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

Eisenstein at 2, 3, and 2 makes x22, x23, and x26 irreducible over Q by [L1]. Thus none of 2,3,6 is rational, and [L2] gives the basis (1,2) of Q(2)/Q.

L1L2
2.1

If 3=a+b2 with a,bQ, squaring and using the basis gives 2ab=0. If b=0, then 3 is rational; if a=0, then 2b is a rational square root of 6. Both contradict step 1.1. Hence x23 has no root in Q(2) and is irreducible there.

step 1.1L2algebra
3.1

By [L2] the second tower step has degree two, and [L3] gives [E:Q]=4.

step 1.1step 2.1L2L3
4.1

The first square root has two distinct images by [L4]. Over each image of Q(2), the second square root has the two distinct images ±3; [L5] shows these fibres exhaust all extensions. Thus the four independent sign choices are exactly the four embeddings.

L4L5L6

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 99 results over 16 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources