How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
as a direct sum of minimal left ideals
Example
For every field and , the left regular module of is the internal direct sum of simple left ideals. See Matrix rings over division rings are semisimple.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The hypotheses and objects in the Example.
For a division ring and , the left regular module of is the direct sum of its simple column ideals . (Matrix rings over division rings are semisimple).
For , , and division rings , every simple left module over is supported on exactly one factor and is isomorphic to that factor's column module . (Simple modules over a product of matrix rings over division rings).
The matrix unit has entries so it has entry in position and everywhere else. (Matrix units and the Kronecker delta).
Verification
The left ideal consists of matrices supported in column . Reading that column identifies it with the natural column module . If a nonzero vector lies in a submodule of , matrix units send it to every standard basis vector, so the submodule is all of ; each column ideal is therefore simple.
Every matrix is the sum of its column matrices, and matrices supported in distinct columns have zero intersection. Hence as a left module.
For this is the single simple left ideal . The decomposition selects minimal left ideals but makes no assertion that these are the only minimal left ideals. This proves the stated claim.
Depends on
Used by
- False statement: every semisimple ring is commutative False statement
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 39 results over 16 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Arvind Nair, Algebra I, Lecture 5 (standard reference, not scraped)