How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The self-adjunction of the contravariant power-set functor induces the double-power-set monad
Example
The contravariant power-set functor is self-adjoint between and . The induced monad on is the covariant double-power-set functor .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The contravariant power-set operation, acting on functions by inverse image.
A natural hom-set bijection determines an adjunction (The unit-counit, hom-set, unit-universal, and counit-universal encodings of an adjunction are equivalent).
Every adjunction induces a monad on the domain of its left adjoint (Every adjunction induces a monad on the domain of its left adjoint).
is the set of all subsets of (The power set ).
Verification
A function is the characteristic assignment of a relation ; transposing gives a function . This natural bijection supplies the self-adjunction by [L1].
Applying [L2], the induced endofunctor is , and its unit is .
For , the multiplication is . This has type . In particular, the construction does not assert a natural map .
Depends on
- Every adjunction induces a monad on the domain of its left adjoint
- The power set $\mathcal{P}(x) = \{\, z : z \subseteq x \,\}$
- Covariant functor, identity functor, composite functor, and contravariant functor
- The unit-counit, hom-set, unit-universal, and counit-universal encodings of an adjunction are equivalent
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 27 results over 16 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- E. Riehl, Category Theory in Context, 2nd ed., Example 5.1.4(vii) (standard reference, not scraped)