How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A finite extension is separable if and only if
Statement
A finite extension is separable if and only if .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite extension .
Every finite separable extension is simple (A finite extension generated by elements all but possibly one of which are separable is simple).
Separable degree is multiplicative in finite towers (Separable degree is multiplicative in finite towers: ).
Separable degree is at most ordinary degree for every finite extension (For a finite extension, ).
For a simple extension, separable degree is the number of distinct roots of the minimal polynomial (The separable degree of is the number of distinct roots of ).
Ordinary degrees multiply in finite towers (Tower law for finite extensions: ).
An extension is separable when every element has separable minimal polynomial over the base (Separable algebraic elements and separable extensions).
Proof
If is separable, [L1] gives . The polynomial is separable, so its number of distinct roots equals its degree; [L4] therefore gives .
Conversely, assume and fix . Put , , , and . Then [L2] and [L5] give , while [L3] gives and .
The inequalities give ; equality of the endpoints and positivity of extension degrees force . By [L4], the minimal polynomial of therefore has as many distinct roots as its degree and is separable.
Since was arbitrary, every element of is separable over , so [L6] makes separable. This proves the reverse implication.
Steps 1.1 and 3.1 establish the biconditional.
Depends on
- A finite extension generated by elements all but possibly one of which are separable is simple
- Separable degree is multiplicative in finite towers: $[L:F]_s=[L:K]_s[K:F]_s$
- For a finite extension, $[K:F]_s\le [K:F]$
- The separable degree of $F(\alpha)/F$ is the number of distinct roots of $m_{\alpha}$
- Tower law for finite extensions: $[L:F]=[L:K][K:F]$
- Separable algebraic elements and separable extensions
Used by
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 47 results over 11 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- P. L. Clark, Field Theory, Chapters 4 and 5 (standard reference, not scraped)
- J. S. Milne, Fields and Galois Theory, Chapters 3 and 5 (standard reference, not scraped)