How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Frattini argument: if and is Sylow in , then
Statement
If is finite and is a Sylow -subgroup of , then See Sylow II: in a finite group every -subgroup lies in a conjugate of any Sylow -subgroup, and the Sylow -subgroups form a single conjugacy class.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The hypotheses and objects in the Statement.
Let be finite, let be a Sylow -subgroup, and let be a -subgroup. There is with . In particular, for every Sylow -subgroup there is with , so the Sylow -subgroups form one conjugacy class. (Sylow II: in a finite group every -subgroup lies in a conjugate of any Sylow -subgroup, and the Sylow -subgroups form a single conjugacy class).
Let be a subgroup (def-subgroup). The normalizer of in is Thus exactly when the conjugation automorphism preserves setwise (thm-conjugation-is-an-automorphism). The subgroup property is proved in lem-centralizers-and-normalizers-are-subgroups. (The normalizer of a subgroup).
If and , then is a subgroup and . Here . (If and , then is a subgroup and ).
Proof
For each , normality makes Sylow in .
Sylow II inside supplies conjugating it back to , so and .
The reverse containment is immediate. This proves the stated claim.
Depends on
- Sylow II: in a finite group every $p$-subgroup lies in a conjugate of any Sylow $p$-subgroup, and the Sylow $p$-subgroups form a single conjugacy class
- The normalizer $N_G(H)=\{g\in G:gHg^{-1}=H\}$ of a subgroup
- If $H\le G$ and $N\mathrel{\trianglelefteq}G$, then $HN$ is a subgroup and $H\cap N\mathrel{\trianglelefteq}H$
Used by
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 41 results over 13 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- David A. Craven, Finite Group Theory, Sections 1.4 and 2.3 (standard reference, not scraped)