TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (deepseek-v4-pro + claude-sonnet-5)audited 2026-08-17

How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Algebra homomorphisms are closed under identities and composition

Statement

For a monad $T$ , identity morphisms are $T$ -algebra homomorphisms, and the composite of two $T$ -algebra homomorphisms is a $T$ -algebra homomorphism. These operations inherit associativity and identity laws from the base category.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: $T$ -algebras and their homomorphisms as in Algebra and algebra homomorphism for a monad.

Proof

technique · direct

1.1

For an algebra $(A, a)$ , functoriality gives $T (1_{A}) = 1_{T A}$ , so $1_{A} \circ a = a = a \circ T (1_{A})$ and $1_{A}$ is an algebra homomorphism.

given

2.1

If $f : (A, a) \to (B, b)$ and $g : (B, b) \to (C, c)$ are algebra homomorphisms, then $(g \circ f) \circ a = g \circ b \circ T (f) = c \circ T (g) \circ T (f) = c \circ T (g \circ f)$ , so their composite is one too.

givenstep 1.1

3.1

Composition of these morphisms is the composition in $C$ ; step 1.1 supplies its identities and step 2.1 its closure, while associativity and the identity laws are inherited from $C$ .

step 1.1step 2.1∎

Depends on

Algebra and algebra homomorphism for a monad

Used by

Eilenberg–Moore category of a monad Definition

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 5 results over 5 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources

E. Riehl, Category Theory in Context, 2nd ed., Definition 5.2.4 (standard reference, not scraped)