How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The cofree–forgetful co-Eilenberg–Moore adjunction induces the given comonad
Statement
For a comonad on , the forgetful functor has a right adjoint , where . The comonad induced by is on the nose.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A comonad on .
A comonad on is a monad on (Comonad on a category).
The Eilenberg–Moore free–forgetful adjunction of a monad induces that monad on the nose (The free–forgetful Eilenberg–Moore adjunction induces the given monad).
Proof
Regard as a monad on and apply [L2] there.
Taking opposites translates algebras into coalgebras, the free algebra into the cofree coalgebra , and the free–forgetful adjunction into . Its unit at is and its counit at is .
The triangle equations translate to and . Therefore the induced endofunctor is , its counit is , and its comultiplication is .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- E. Riehl, Category Theory in Context, 2nd ed., Exercise 5.2.iii (standard reference, not scraped)