How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The inclusion of a reflective full subcategory is monadic
Statement
If is a reflective full subcategory of , then its inclusion is monadic.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A reflection as in Reflective full subcategory and reflector.
A reflection is an adjunction with the full inclusion (Reflective full subcategory and reflector).
Algebras for an idempotent monad are exactly the objects whose unit is invertible, with the unique inverse-unit structure (Algebras for an idempotent monad form a reflective subcategory).
An adjunction induces the monad formed from its right adjoint after its left adjoint (Every adjunction induces a monad on the domain of its left adjoint).
Every component of the counit of a reflection is an isomorphism (The counit of a reflection is an isomorphism).
Proof
By [L1] and [L3], the reflection induces the monad on with multiplication . By [L4] this multiplication is a natural isomorphism, so is idempotent (Idempotent monad).
By [L2], the Eilenberg–Moore category of is the full subcategory of objects for which the reflection unit is invertible. The comparison sends to , and its essential image is exactly this fixed-object subcategory.
Fullness of makes the comparison fully faithful, and every algebra has the specified isomorphism to the comparison image of . Thus the comparison is an equivalence, so is monadic by Monadic and strictly monadic functors.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 24 results over 12 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- E. Riehl, Category Theory in Context, 2nd ed., Proposition 5.3.3(ii) (standard reference, not scraped)