Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-17
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

On a preorder the comonads are exactly the monotone contractive maps with Gp below G(Gp); on a poset they are exactly the interior operators

Statement

Let P be a preorder. A comonad on P is equivalently a monotone map G:P→P such that Gp≤p and Gp≤G(Gp) for every p. These inequalities force Gp and G(Gp) to be mutually comparable. If P is a poset, this is equivalently an interior operator: a monotone, contractive, idempotent map.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A preorder P.

[L1]

A comonad on P is a monad on Pop (Comonad on a category).

[L2]

Monads on a preorder are exactly its monotone extensive maps equipped with the reverse comparison from their square (On a preorder the monads are exactly the monotone extensive maps with T(Tp) below Tp; on a poset they are exactly the closure operators).

[L3]

Reversing a preorder reverses each inequality (Opposite category Cop).

[L4]

In a poset, mutual comparability implies equality (Partial order and partially ordered set).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L1L3

By [L1], regard G as a monad on Pop, with its counit and comultiplication serving as the unit and multiplication there.

2.1L2L3step 1.1

Applying [L2] in the opposite order gives monotonicity, Gp≤p, and Gp≤G(Gp). Monotonicity applied to Gp≤p gives G(Gp)≤Gp, so the two values are mutually comparable.

3.1L1L2L3L4step 2.1∎

Conversely, the stated inequalities reverse to the data in [L2] on Pop, hence give a comonad by [L1]. If P is a poset, [L4] makes the two comparisons equivalent to G(Gp)=Gp, precisely the idempotence condition for an interior operator.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

8 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources