How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Composing with an adjunction that induces the identity monad on the nose does not change the induced monad
Statement
Let and be adjunctions. Suppose the monad induced by is the identity monad on on the nose: , , and . Then the monad induced on by the composite adjunction is the monad induced by on the nose.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The two adjunctions and the displayed strict identity-monad hypotheses.
The composite adjunction has unit and counit (Adjunctions compose with the composite unit and counit formulas).
Proof
The composite induced endofunctor is , and [L1] with gives .
Its multiplication is . Expanding by [L1], then using and , reduces this transformation to .
The endofunctor, unit, and multiplication obtained in steps 1.1 and 2.1 are exactly , , and , so the two induced monads agree on the nose.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 12 results over 6 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- S. Mac Lane, Categories for the Working Mathematician, 2nd ed., Exercise VI.5.5 (standard reference, not scraped)