Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-16
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Adjunctions compose with the composite unit and counit formulas

Statement

Let F:C→D be left adjoint to G:D→C, with unit η and counit ε, and let F′:D→E be left adjoint to G′:E→D, with unit η′ and counit ε′. Then

F′F⊣GG′

with unit and counit

ηˉ=(Gη′F)∘η:1C⇒GG′F′F,

εˉ=ε′∘(F′εG′):F′FGG′⇒1E.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The two adjunctions and their units and counits as in the Statement.

[L1]

An adjunction is determined by a unit, a counit, and the two triangle identities (Adjunction by unit, counit, and the triangle identities).

[F1]

Whenever the expressions are defined, the interchange identity is (β′∘β)∗(α′∘α)=(β′∗α′)∘(β∗α) (Horizontal and vertical composition of natural transformations satisfy the interchange law).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1

Whiskering gives Gη′F:GF⇒GG′F′F and F′εG′:F′FGG′⇒F′G′, so the displayed composites have the required types; they are natural because whiskering and vertical composition preserve naturality.

2.1F1step 1.1

Expanding the first triangle composite for F′F gives (εˉF′F)∘(F′Fηˉ)=(ε′F′F)∘(F′εG′F′F)∘(F′FGη′F)∘(F′Fη). Interchange rewrites the two middle factors as F′[(εG′F′F)∘(FGη′F)], and naturality of ε at the component ηFc′ turns that bracket into (η′F)∘(εF).

2.2F1L1step 1.1

Expanding the second triangle composite for GG′ gives (GG′εˉ)∘(ηˉGG′)=(GG′ε′)∘(GG′F′εG′)∘(Gη′FGG′)∘(ηGG′). Interchange rewrites the two middle factors as G[(G′F′εG′)∘(η′FGG′)], and naturality of η′ at the component εG′d turns that bracket into (η′G′)∘(εG′). The composite becomes G[(G′ε′)∘(η′G′)]∘[(Gε)∘(ηG)]G′, which by the two second triangle identities Gε∘ηG=1G and G′ε′∘η′G′=1G′ is 1GG′.

3.1L1step 2.1

By step 2.1 the first composite becomes [(ε′F′)∘(F′η′)]F∘F′[(εF)∘(Fη)], which by the two first triangle identities εF∘Fη=1F and ε′F′∘F′η′=1F′ is 1F′F.

4.1step 3.1step 2.2L1∎

Thus ηˉ and εˉ satisfy both triangle identities, and [L1] gives F′F⊣GG′.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources