How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Integral elements over a nonzero base ring form a subring
Statement
Let be commutative rings with . The elements of integral over form a subring of . See Integrality and finite-module characterizations for one element.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The hypotheses and objects in the Statement.
Let be commutative rings with , and let . Then is integral over if and only if is finitely generated as an -module, if and only if there exists a faithful -module that is finitely generated over . (Integrality and finite-module characterizations for one element).
Let be a homomorphism of commutative rings. An element is integral over when it is a root of a monic polynomial in . The extension is integral when every element is integral. An algebraic integer is a complex number integral over . (Integral elements over a commutative ring and algebraic integers).
Proof
If are integral, is finite over , and the monic equation for over is also one over ; multiplying finite generating sets shows that is finite over .
For each , the -module is faithful and finite over , so the finite-module criterion makes integral.
The elements and are roots of the monic polynomials and , respectively; step 2.1 supplies closure under addition, multiplication, and additive inverses, including coincident elements. Thus the integral elements form a unital subring of .
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 18 results over 5 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Eloisa Grifo, Commutative Algebra I, Section 1.4 (standard reference, not scraped)