How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
FALSE: The Kleisli and Eilenberg–Moore categories are equivalent for every monad
Statement
False claim: for every monad, its Kleisli and Eilenberg–Moore categories are equivalent.
The free-monoid monad on is a counterexample.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The free-monoid monad on .
Its Kleisli hom-set from to is (Kleisli category of a monad; The free-monoid monad has monoids as its Eilenberg–Moore algebras).
Its Eilenberg–Moore category is the category of monoids (The free-monoid monad has monoids as its Eilenberg–Moore algebras).
A functor is an equivalence exactly when it is fully faithful and split essentially surjective (A functor is an equivalence exactly when it is fully faithful and split essentially surjective, without Choice); an equivalence consists of quasi-inverse functors and natural isomorphisms and (Equivalence, quasi-inverse, and adjoint equivalence of categories), and is fully faithful when every is bijective (Faithful, full, fully faithful, essentially surjective, and split essentially surjective functors).
The canonical Kleisli comparison is fully faithful with image the free algebras (The comparison from the Kleisli category is fully faithful with image the free algebras).
For an idempotent monad , the canonical comparison is an equivalence of categories (The Kleisli and Eilenberg–Moore categories of an idempotent monad are equivalent).
Refutation
By [L1], the endomorphism set of in the Kleisli category is .
The monoid with has exactly two endomorphisms: an endomorphism fixes , and it may send to either idempotent or .
If , this function set is a singleton. If is nonempty, choose ; the words are distinct, and the corresponding constant functions show that is infinite.
If the two categories were equivalent, essential surjectivity would place in the image up to isomorphism, and full faithfulness would give a bijection between its two-element endomorphism set and the endomorphism set of some Kleisli object. Step 2.1 rules this out.
The claim is therefore false. The positive boundary is [L4], that the canonical comparison is fully faithful with image the free algebras, together with [L5], that it is an equivalence when the monad is idempotent.
Depends on
- The comparison from the Kleisli category is fully faithful with image the free algebras
- The free-monoid monad has monoids as its Eilenberg–Moore algebras
- Kleisli category of a monad
- Eilenberg–Moore category of a monad
- Semigroup and monoid
- Equivalence, quasi-inverse, and adjoint equivalence of categories
- Faithful, full, fully faithful, essentially surjective, and split essentially surjective functors
- A functor is an equivalence exactly when it is fully faithful and split essentially surjective, without Choice
- The Kleisli and Eilenberg–Moore categories of an idempotent monad are equivalent
- The free-monoid functor is left adjoint to the underlying-set functor
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 53 results over 16 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- E. Riehl, Category Theory in Context, 2nd ed., Lemma 5.2.14 (standard reference, not scraped)