How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Equivalence, quasi-inverse, and adjoint equivalence of categories
Definition
An equivalence of categories from to consists of functors and , called quasi-inverses, together with natural isomorphisms
The categories are then called equivalent. The notions of functor and natural isomorphism are those of Covariant functor, identity functor, composite functor, and contravariant functor and Natural isomorphism.
An adjoint equivalence is such data satisfying the triangle identities
Here , , , and are the whiskerings of Whiskering and horizontal composition of natural transformations. No triangle identity is required of a bare equivalence.
Depends on
Used by
- A two-object indiscrete preorder is equivalent but not isomorphic to its one-object poset reflection Counterexample
- Chosen bases exhibit Mat_F as equivalent to finite-dimensional vector spaces Example
- Pointed sets are equivalent to sets and partial functions but not isomorphic as categories Example
- Every equivalence of categories is an isomorphism of categories False statement
- Equivalence of categories is reflexive, symmetric, and transitive Proposition
- A functor is an equivalence exactly when it is fully faithful and split essentially surjective, without Choice Theorem
- Every equivalence of categories can be equipped as an adjoint equivalence Theorem
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 12 results over 9 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Emily Riehl, Category Theory in Context, Chapter 1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Ahrens, Kapulkin and Shulman, Univalent categories and the Rezk completion, section 6 (standard reference, not scraped)