How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Whiskering and horizontal composition of natural transformations
Definition
Let be a natural transformation (Natural transformation and its components), and let and be functors (Covariant functor, identity functor, composite functor, and contravariant functor). The left whiskering has components , and the right whiskering has components .
For , the horizontal composite has either equal component formula
Their equality is the naturality equation for at . Naturality of the resulting family is proved in Horizontal composites of natural transformations satisfy naturality ↗.
Depends on
Used by
- Equivalence, quasi-inverse, and adjoint equivalence of categories Definition
- Horizontal composites of natural transformations satisfy naturality Lemma
- Equivalence of categories is reflexive, symmetric, and transitive Proposition
- Horizontal and vertical composition of natural transformations satisfy the interchange law Theorem
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 6 results over 5 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Emily Riehl, Category Theory in Context, Chapter 1 (standard reference, not scraped)