How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Horizontal composites of natural transformations satisfy naturality
Statement
The horizontal composite of natural transformations satisfies the naturality equation.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Natural transformations and , and in .
Horizontal composition has component , and functors preserve composition (Whiskering and horizontal composition of natural transformations).
Proof
Naturality of at gives , while functoriality sends the naturality equation to .
Combining these equations gives .
The two outer composites are exactly and , which proves naturality.
Depends on
Used by
- Equivalence of categories is reflexive, symmetric, and transitive Proposition
- Horizontal and vertical composition of natural transformations satisfy the interchange law Theorem
- Natural transformations have mates under a pair of adjunctions Theorem
Cited to discharge well-definedness by Whiskering and horizontal composition of natural transformations.
Dependency tree · two levels
3 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Emily Riehl, Category Theory in Context, Chapter 1 (standard reference, not scraped)