How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Equivalence of categories is reflexive, symmetric, and transitive
Statement
Equivalence of categories is reflexive, symmetric, and transitive.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Categories and equivalence data between them.
An equivalence consists of quasi-inverse functors and natural isomorphisms in both composite directions (Equivalence, quasi-inverse, and adjoint equivalence of categories).
Vertical composition is componentwise (Identity natural transformation and vertical composition); whiskering and horizontal composition produce natural transformations between composite functors (Whiskering and horizontal composition of natural transformations), and those horizontal composites are natural (Horizontal composites of natural transformations satisfy naturality).
Proof
The identity functor is its own quasi-inverse and the identity natural transformations supply an equivalence , proving reflexivity.
If gives , then gives , proving symmetry.
If gives and gives , then and are quasi-inverses; whiskering and vertically composing the two units gives , and doing the same with the counits gives , so [L2] proves transitivity.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 11 results over 8 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Emily Riehl, Category Theory in Context, Chapter 1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Ahrens, Kapulkin and Shulman, Univalent categories and the Rezk completion, section 6 (standard reference, not scraped)