Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-08-11
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Equivalence of categories is reflexive, symmetric, and transitive

Statement

Equivalence of categories is reflexive, symmetric, and transitive.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Categories and equivalence data between them.

[L1]

An equivalence consists of quasi-inverse functors and natural isomorphisms in both composite directions (Equivalence, quasi-inverse, and adjoint equivalence of categories).

[L2]

Vertical composition is componentwise (Identity natural transformation and vertical composition); whiskering and horizontal composition produce natural transformations between composite functors (Whiskering and horizontal composition of natural transformations), and those horizontal composites are natural (Horizontal composites of natural transformations satisfy naturality).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

The identity functor is its own quasi-inverse and the identity natural transformations supply an equivalence CC\mathcal C\simeq\mathcal C, proving reflexivity.

givenL1
2.1

If (F,G,η,ε)(F,G,\eta,\varepsilon) gives CD\mathcal C\simeq\mathcal D, then (G,F,ε1,η1)(G,F,\varepsilon^{-1},\eta^{-1}) gives DC\mathcal D\simeq\mathcal C, proving symmetry.

step 1.1L1
3.1

If (F,G)(F,G) gives CD\mathcal C\simeq\mathcal D and (H,K)(H,K) gives DE\mathcal D\simeq\mathcal E, then HFHF and GKGK are quasi-inverses; whiskering and vertically composing the two units gives 1CGKHF1_{\mathcal C}\Rightarrow GKHF, and doing the same with the counits gives HFGK1EHFGK\Rightarrow1_{\mathcal E}, so [L2] proves transitivity.

step 2.1L1L2

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 11 results over 8 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources