CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11

How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A two-object indiscrete preorder is equivalent but not isomorphic to its one-object poset reflection

Statement refuted

Equivalence of categories does not imply isomorphism of categories.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The preorder $C = {0, 1}$ with $x \leq y$ for every $x, y$ , and the one-object poset $D = {*}$ .

[L1]

Preorders become thin categories and monotone maps become functors (A preorder is a category with at most one morphism between any two objects, and its functors are exactly monotone maps).

[L2]

Quasi-inverse functors with natural isomorphisms give an equivalence (Equivalence, quasi-inverse, and adjoint equivalence of categories).

[L3]

A category isomorphism is bijective on objects (A functor is an isomorphism of categories exactly when its object and morphism maps are bijective).

Counterexample

technique · direct

1.1

Let $F : C \to D$ be the unique functor and let $G : D \to C$ select $0$ . Then $F G = 1_{D}$ .

1.2

But $C$ has two objects and $D$ has one. No functor between them is bijective on objects, so [L3] rules out an isomorphism of categories.

2.1

The functor $G F$ is constant at $0$ . Since $C$ has exactly one arrow between every ordered pair of objects, the unique arrows $x \to 0$ are the components of a natural isomorphism $1_{C} \Rightarrow G F$ .

step 1.1L1

3.1

Hence $F$ and $G$ exhibit $C ≃ D$ by [L2].

step 1.1step 2.1L2

4.1

Thus $C$ and its one-object poset reflection $D$ are equivalent but not isomorphic.

step 3.1step 1.2∎

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources

Emily Riehl, Category Theory in Context, discussion after Definition 1.5.5 (standard reference, not scraped)