How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The inclusion of one object into a discrete two-object category is fully faithful but not essentially surjective
Statement refuted
Full faithfulness alone does not imply essential surjectivity.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The one-object discrete category and the two-object discrete category .
Full faithfulness means bijectivity on every hom-collection, while essential surjectivity requires every target object to be isomorphic to an image object (Faithful, full, fully faithful, essentially surjective, and split essentially surjective functors).
Counterexample
Let send to . The sole hom-map is the bijection , so is fully faithful by [L1].
In the discrete category , the only isomorphisms are identities. Therefore the object is not isomorphic to , so is not essentially surjective.
This finite inclusion is fully faithful by step 1.1 but not essentially surjective by step 1.2.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.