How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A componentwise family between functors need not be a natural transformation
Statement refuted
Choosing one morphism between each pair of object values of two functors does not automatically give a natural transformation.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The walking-arrow category and the category .
Naturality requires for the arrow (Natural transformation and its components).
Sets and functions form (Sets and functions form the large locally small category ).
Counterexample
Let be constant at the singleton and let be constant at , with both functors sending to the relevant identity function.
Define components by and . Each is a valid function .
At , the left side of the naturality equation sends to , whereas the right side sends to . Thus .
The family has a component of the correct type at every object but fails naturality.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
8 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.