How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The injection is monic in but is not split
Statement refuted
The assertion that every monomorphism is a split monomorphism is false.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The unique function .
Monomorphisms in are exactly injections (In , monomorphisms are exactly injections and epimorphisms are exactly surjections).
A split monomorphism requires a retraction with (Split monomorphism, split epimorphism, retraction, and section).
Counterexample
The map is injective because its domain has no elements, so [L1] makes it a monomorphism.
There is no function , since the value would have to be an element of the empty set.
Therefore admits no retraction and is not split by [L2], although it is monic by step 1.1.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 12 results over 5 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.