Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A functor need not preserve monomorphisms

Statement refuted

The assertion that every functor preserves monomorphisms is false.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The walking-arrow category 2=(0→m1) and Set.

[L1]
[L2]

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1

The only morphism of 2 with codomain 0 is 10. Thus any parallel r,s with mr=ms must both equal 10, so m is monic by [L2].

L2
1.2

Define a functor F:2→Set by F(0)={0,1}, F(1)={∗}, and F(m) the constant function. This assignment respects all possible identities and composites, so it is a functor.

L1L3
2.1

Let r,s:{∗}→{0,1} select 0 and 1, respectively. Then r≠s but F(m)r=F(m)s, so F(m) is not monic by [L2].

step 1.2L2
3.1

The monomorphism m of step 1.1 is sent by the functor F to the nonmonomorphism of step 2.1. This is the required counterexample.

step 1.1step 2.1∎

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.