How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Monomorphism and epimorphism by left and right cancellation
Definition
Let be a morphism in a category (Category, object, morphism, domain, codomain, identity, composition, and hom-collection).
- is a monomorphism, or monic, when implies for every parallel pair .
- is an epimorphism, or epic, when implies for every parallel pair .
Thus monomorphisms are left-cancellable and epimorphisms are right-cancellable. The definitions are formally dual.
Depends on
Used by
- Right adjoints preserve monomorphisms and left adjoints preserve epimorphisms Corollary
- A functor need not preserve monomorphisms Counterexample
- A monotone functor between poset categories preserves every monomorphism but need not preserve pullbacks Counterexample
- Comember and the dual calculus Definition
- Equivalence of members Definition
- Freyd's axioms A0, A1, A1*, A2, A2*, A3, and A3* for abelian categories Definition
- Normal monomorphisms and conormal epimorphisms Definition
- Subobject and quotient object as mutual-factorisation classes of monomorphisms and epimorphisms Definition
- Subobject classifier Definition
- Well-powered and co-well-powered categories, and supplied well-powerings Definition
- A pullback of a monomorphism is a monomorphism, and a pushout of an epimorphism is an epimorphism Lemma
- The legs of a limiting cone are jointly monic, and the legs of a colimiting cocone are jointly epic Lemma
- Wide pullbacks compute intersections of supplied set-indexed subobject representatives independently of the representatives Lemma
- Identities and composites of monomorphisms or epimorphisms retain cancellation; split monomorphisms are monic and split epimorphisms are epic Proposition
- The kernel of a monomorphism is zero and the cokernel of an epimorphism is zero Proposition
- A complete locally small category with a jointly weakly initial set has an initial object, without class-indexed choice Theorem
- A complete locally small category with a small coseparating set and intersections of all subobject collections has an initial object Theorem
- Epimorphy is detected by members Theorem
- For a monad, invertibility of multiplication, monicity of every multiplication component, and equality of the two whiskered units are equivalent Theorem
- Fullness and faithfulness of a right adjoint are detected by its counit Theorem
- In a preadditive category with a zero object, a morphism is monic exactly when its kernel is zero Theorem
- In Set, monomorphisms are exactly injections and epimorphisms are exactly surjections Theorem
- Monicity is detected by members Theorem
- Mutual factorisation is an equivalence relation on monomorphisms into an object and dually on epimorphisms out of it Theorem
- The inclusion ℤ↪ℚ is monic and epic but neither surjective nor an isomorphism in Ring Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
3 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Emily Riehl, Category Theory in Context, Chapter 1 (standard reference, not scraped)