How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Wide pullbacks compute intersections of supplied set-indexed subobject representatives independently of the representatives
Statement
Let be a supplied family of monomorphisms indexed by a set. If its wide pullback exists, the induced morphism is monic and represents the intersection of the subobjects . For , take . Replacing any by an equivalent representative produces the same subobject .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A set , monomorphisms , and their wide-pullback cone when is nonempty.
A limit of a diagram is a cone over it admitting a unique mediating map from every cone over the same diagram (Limits and colimits as terminal cones and initial cocones, with existence and uniqueness in their universal properties).
A monomorphism is left-cancellable (Monomorphism and epimorphism by left and right cancellation).
The legs of a limiting cone are jointly monic (The legs of a limiting cone are jointly monic, and the legs of a colimiting cocone are jointly epic).
An intersection is the greatest lower bound in the subobject order (Intersection of a supplied family of subobjects as its greatest lower bound).
Mutually factoring monomorphisms have unique inverse isomorphisms as factor maps and represent the same subobject (Mutual factorisation is an equivalence relation on monomorphisms into an object and dually on epimorphisms out of it).
Proof
If , every subobject of factors through , so represents the greatest subobject of ; the empty family imposes no lower-bound condition, so is its greatest lower bound and hence its intersection by [L4].
Suppose is nonempty and write , independent of . If , then monicity of every gives for all , and joint monicity in [L3] gives ; hence is monic. Each equality makes . If factors through every , its factor maps form a cone and [L1] gives a unique with , so . Thus [L4] makes the intersection.
By [L5], representatives of the same subobject mutually factor and their factor maps are unique inverse isomorphisms over . Composing a wide-pullback cone with these isomorphisms gives a cone for the replacement family, and [L1] supplies mutually inverse comparison maps between the two pullback apices. Their induced monomorphisms into therefore mutually factor, so they represent the same intersection subobject.
Depends on
- Intersection of a supplied family of subobjects as its greatest lower bound
- Limits and colimits as terminal cones and initial cocones, with existence and uniqueness in their universal properties
- Monomorphism and epimorphism by left and right cancellation
- The legs of a limiting cone are jointly monic, and the legs of a colimiting cocone are jointly epic
- Mutual factorisation is an equivalence relation on monomorphisms into an object and dually on epimorphisms out of it
Used by
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 20 results over 9 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- S. Mac Lane, Categories for the Working Mathematician, section V.8 (standard reference, not scraped)
- E. Riehl, Category Theory in Context, section 4.7 (standard reference, not scraped)