How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
An adjunction restricts to an equivalence on the subcategories fixed by its unit and counit
Statement
For an adjunction , let be the full subcategory of objects for which is an isomorphism, and let be the full subcategory of objects for which is an isomorphism. Then and restrict to an adjoint equivalence
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An adjunction with unit and counit .
A full subcategory contains chosen objects and all morphisms between them from the ambient category (Subcategory and full subcategory).
An equivalence consists of quasi-inverse functors and natural isomorphisms between their composites and the identity functors (Equivalence, quasi-inverse, and adjoint equivalence of categories).
The triangle identities are and (Adjunction by unit, counit, and the triangle identities).
Proof
If is invertible, then is invertible, and the first triangle identity makes ; hence .
Dually, if is invertible, then the second triangle identity makes ; hence .
By [F1], and therefore restrict to functors between the two full subcategories, and the restricted unit and counit remain natural.
Every component of the restricted unit and counit is an isomorphism by definition, so [F2] makes the restrictions quasi-inverse equivalences; the inherited triangle identities make the equivalence adjoint.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 14 results over 10 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Emily Riehl, Category Theory in Context, 2nd ed., Lemma 4.2.11 (standard reference, not scraped)