Alphabeta MathHow statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Conjugation preserves invertibility but the general mates correspondence need not
When both adjunctions in Natural transformations have mates under a pair of adjunctions are adjoint equivalences, all unit and counit components in the mate formulas are isomorphisms. A mate is then obtained from the original transformation by whiskering and composing with isomorphisms, so invertibility is preserved. For a general adjunction the unit or counit need not be invertible; an identity transformation can have such a component as its mate. The mates bijection therefore preserves equations and typed pasting, not invertibility in general.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 10 results over 6 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Emily Riehl, Category Theory in Context, 2nd ed., Exercise 4.3.iv (standard reference, not scraped)