Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-17
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A field is perfect exactly when it has characteristic zero or its Frobenius map is surjective

Statement

A field F is perfect if and only if either char⁡F=0, or char⁡F=p>0 and the Frobenius map a↦ap is surjective.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field F.

[L1]

A field is perfect when all of its nonconstant irreducible polynomials are separable (Perfect fields: every irreducible polynomial is separable).

[L2]

In characteristic p, every irreducible polynomial has a unique form g(xpe) with g irreducible and separable (In characteristic p, every irreducible polynomial is uniquely g(xpe) with g irreducible and separable).

[L5]

A nonzero polynomial is separable exactly when it is coprime to its derivative (A nonzero polynomial over a field is separable exactly when its gcd with its derivative is 1).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L1L5algebra

If char⁡F=0 and f is irreducible, then f′≠0; any common nonconstant divisor of f and f′ would be associated to f, which is impossible because deg⁡f′<deg⁡f. Thus gcd⁡(f,f′)=1, so f is separable by [L5].

1.2L2L4

Suppose char⁡F=p>0 and Frobenius is surjective. For irreducible f=g(xpe) as in [L2], if e>0 then taking peth roots of the coefficients through repeated surjectivity and using [L4] would write f as a peth power of a nonconstant polynomial, contradicting irreducibility. Hence e=0 and every irreducible is separable.

1.3L1L3

Conversely, if Frobenius is not surjective, choose a∉Fp. Then [L3] makes xp−a irreducible, while its derivative is zero, so it is not separable and F is not perfect.

2.1step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3∎

The characteristic-zero argument and the two implications in positive characteristic establish the equivalence.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

20 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources