Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-08-17
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A field is perfect exactly when it has characteristic zero or its Frobenius map is surjective

Statement

A field F is perfect if and only if either charF=0, or charF=p>0 and the Frobenius map aap is surjective.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field F.

[L1]

A field is perfect when all of its nonconstant irreducible polynomials are separable (Perfect fields: every irreducible polynomial is separable).

[L2]

In characteristic p, every irreducible polynomial has a unique form g(xpe) with g irreducible and separable (In characteristic p, every irreducible polynomial is uniquely g(xpe) with g irreducible and separable).

[L5]

A nonzero polynomial is separable exactly when it is coprime to its derivative (A nonzero polynomial over a field is separable exactly when its gcd with its derivative is 1).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

If charF=0 and f is irreducible, then f0; any common nonconstant divisor of f and f would be associated to f, which is impossible because degf<degf. Thus gcd(f,f)=1, so f is separable by [L5].

L1L5algebra
1.2

Suppose charF=p>0 and Frobenius is surjective. For irreducible f=g(xpe) as in [L2], if e>0 then taking peth roots of the coefficients through repeated surjectivity and using [L4] would write f as a peth power of a nonconstant polynomial, contradicting irreducibility. Hence e=0 and every irreducible is separable.

L2L4
1.3

Conversely, if Frobenius is not surjective, choose aFp. Then [L3] makes xpa irreducible, while its derivative is zero, so it is not separable and F is not perfect.

L1L3
2.1

The characteristic-zero argument and the two implications in positive characteristic establish the equivalence.

step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 68 results over 14 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources