CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (deepseek-v4-pro + claude-sonnet-5)audited 2026-08-17

How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Goursat's theorem for rectangles: a holomorphic function integrates to zero around every rectangle contained in its domain

Statement

Let $U \subseteq C$ be open, let $f : U \to C$ be holomorphic, and fix $a \in C$ and real numbers $w, h > 0$ . Suppose the closed rectangle

$R = {a + x + i y : 0 \leq x \leq w, 0 \leq y \leq h}$

is contained in $U$ . Put $b = a + w$ , $c = a + w + i h$ , and $d = a + i h$ . Its positively oriented boundary is the closed rectifiable contour

$\partial R = ℓ_{a b} * ℓ_{b c} * ℓ_{c d} * ℓ_{d a}$

using the directed segments and concatenation of Filled complex triangles, their oriented three-edge boundary contours, diameter, and perimeter and Rectifiable complex contours, reversal, concatenation, closedness, and orientation. Then

$\int_{\partial R} f (z) d z = 0.$

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The rectangle $R \subseteq U$ , its ordered vertices $a, b, c, d$ , its positively oriented boundary as displayed, and a holomorphic $f : U \to C$ .

[L1]

A holomorphic function integrates to zero around the oriented boundary of every filled triangle contained in its open domain (Goursat's triangle theorem: a holomorphic function integrates to zero around every triangle contained in its domain).

[L2]

Reversal negates a contour integral and concatenation adds contour integrals (Complex line integrals change sign under reversal and add under concatenation).

Proof

technique · direct

1.1

The diagonal from $a$ to $c$ splits $R$ into the filled triangles $Δ [a, b, c]$ and $Δ [a, c, d]$ , both contained in $U$ .

given

2.1

By [L1], the integrals over the positively oriented boundaries $a \to b \to c \to a$ and $a \to c \to d \to a$ are both zero.

step 1.1L1

3.1

Adding those identities, the diagonal $c \to a$ in the first boundary cancels the diagonal $a \to c$ in the second by [L2].

step 2.1L2

4.1

The surviving directed sides are $a \to b \to c \to d \to a$ , exactly the displayed positive boundary $\partial R$ , so its integral is zero.

step 3.1L2∎

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 84 results over 17 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources

E. Stein and R. Shakarchi, Complex Analysis, Ch. 2, Corollary 1.2 (standard reference, not scraped)