Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-17
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Goursat's triangle theorem: a holomorphic function integrates to zero around every triangle contained in its domain

Statement

Let U⊆C be open and let f:U→C be holomorphic. If the filled triangle T=Δ[a,b,c] of Filled complex triangles, their oriented three-edge boundary contours, diameter, and perimeter is contained in U, then

∫∂Tf(z) dz=0.

No continuity of f′ is assumed, and repeated or collinear vertices are allowed.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An open set U, a holomorphic function f:U→C, and a filled triangle T0⊆U.

[L1]

Nested midpoint selection supplies triangles Tn, a common point z∗, the retention estimate ∣If(Tn)∣≥4−n∣If(T0)∣, and the formulas P(Tn)=2−nP(T0) and diam⁡(Tn)=2−ndiam⁡(T0) (Goursat bisection selects nested triangles retaining one quarter of the boundary-integral magnitude, with halving diameters and a one-point intersection).

[L2]

If P is holomorphic on an open set, P′ is continuous there, and γ is a closed rectifiable contour, then ∫γP′(z) dz=0 (The integral of a continuous complex derivative over every closed rectifiable contour is zero).

[L4]

The ML estimate bounds the modulus of a contour integral by a bound for the integrand on the trace times the contour length (ML estimate: a contour integral is bounded by a supremum bound times path length).

[L5]
[L6]

Complex line integrals are linear in the integrand (Complex line integrals are linear in the integrand).

[L7]

The complex derivative at a is the limit of (f(a+h)−f(a))/h as nonzero increments h tend to zero within the open domain (Complex differentiability at a point, the complex derivative, holomorphic functions, and entire functions).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L1L5

By [L5], f is continuous, so [L1] gives selected triangles Tn with common point z∗ and all the stated retention and scaling formulas.

1.2givenL7

By [L7], differentiability at z∗ gives f(w)=f(z∗)+f′(z∗)(w−z∗)+(w−z∗)η(w), where η(w)→0 as w→z∗; set η(z∗)=0.

1.3L2L3

Put P(w)=f(z∗)w+12f′(z∗)(w−z∗)2. By [L3], P is entire and P′(w)=f(z∗)+f′(z∗)(w−z∗) is a polynomial, hence continuous. Every ∂Tn is a closed rectifiable contour, so all hypotheses of [L2] hold and ∫∂TnP′(w) dw=0.

2.1step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3L1L4L6

Given ε>0, take n so large that ∣η(w)∣<ε whenever ∣w−z∗∣≤diam⁡(Tn); this is possible by step 1.2 and the diameter limit in [L1]. Since z∗∈Tn, [L4], [L6], and step 1.3 give ∣If(Tn)∣≤εdiam⁡(Tn)P(Tn).

3.1step 2.1L1algebra∎

The retention and scaling formulas yield ∣If(T0)∣≤4n∣If(Tn)∣≤εdiam⁡(T0)P(T0). Because this holds for every ε>0, If(T0)=0; the argument never divides by the initial integral, diameter, or perimeter, so it also covers zero integrals and degenerate triangles.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

38 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources