How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Cauchy-kernel contour integrals may be differentiated by a direct difference-quotient estimate
Statement
Let be a rectifiable contour, let be continuous on its trace, and let be open and disjoint from that trace. For every natural number , with powers understood as in Integer powers in the complex field, define the following The complex line integral over a rectifiable path as a componentwise Riemann–Stieltjes integral:
Then is holomorphic on and
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A rectifiable contour , continuous boundary data , an open set disjoint from the trace, and a natural .
A continuous integrand has a complex line integral along every rectifiable contour (Continuous integrands have complex and absolute line integrals along every rectifiable path).
Complex line integrals are linear, and the ML estimate bounds an integral by a uniform integrand bound times the contour length (Complex line integrals are linear in the integrand, ML estimate: a contour integral is bounded by a supremum bound times path length).
A closed bounded interval is compact, continuous images of compact metric spaces are compact, and compact subsets of metric spaces are bounded (Heine-Borel by bisection: every closed bounded interval is compact, The image of a compact metric space under a continuous map is compact, and so is the image of any compact subset, A compact subset of a metric space is closed and bounded).
The complex modulus is multiplicative and satisfies the triangle inequality (Conjugation is an involutive real-field automorphism, , and modulus is definite, multiplicative, and subadditive).
Proof
For every , the function is continuous on the trace, so exists by [L1]. Moreover, [L3] applied to gives a finite with on the trace.
Fix . Choose with ; because the trace is disjoint from , satisfies , and if then .
The finite power identity gives , and after subtracting the remainder is ; by step 1.2 and [L4], its modulus is at most , uniformly on the trace.
By [L2], the difference between and has modulus at most a fixed finite constant times , which tends to zero. Hence ; since was arbitrary, is holomorphic on . The estimate also covers and a constant contour, while is only the excluded difference-quotient value.
Depends on
- The complex line integral over a rectifiable path as a componentwise Riemann–Stieltjes integral
- Continuous integrands have complex and absolute line integrals along every rectifiable path
- Complex line integrals are linear in the integrand
- ML estimate: a contour integral is bounded by a supremum bound times path length
- Conjugation is an involutive real-field automorphism, $z\overline z=|z|^2$, and modulus is definite, multiplicative, and subadditive
- Heine-Borel by bisection: every closed bounded interval $[a,b]$ is compact
- The image of a compact metric space under a continuous map is compact, and so is the image of any compact subset
- A compact subset of a metric space is closed and bounded
- Integer powers in the complex field
Used by
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 135 results over 18 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Lars Ahlfors, Complex Analysis, third edition, Ch. 4, Section 2.3, Lemma 3 (standard reference, not scraped)