How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Conjugation is an involutive real-field automorphism, , and modulus is definite, multiplicative, and subadditive
Statement
Complex conjugation is a real-field automorphism satisfying For every ,
Facts & Assumptions
Given: and .
Complex numbers have unique real coordinates and the coordinate addition and multiplication formulas ( is a field, every element is uniquely , and every nonzero element has inverse ).
Conjugation and modulus are defined by and (Real and imaginary parts, complex conjugation, and modulus).
The real numbers are a complete ordered field (The Cauchy-sequence reals have the least-upper-bound property), and every nonnegative element of a complete ordered field has a unique nonnegative square root (Square roots exist: a unique with ; the positives are ).
For nonnegative elements of an ordered field, if and only if (Squaring is monotone on the nonnegatives).
The square of every nonzero element of an ordered field is positive (Squares of nonzero elements are positive).
Proof
Coordinate expansion using [F1] and [F2] proves the two homomorphism laws, that conjugation fixes every real number, and that applying it twice is the identity. Thus conjugation is an involutive real-field automorphism.
Direct multiplication gives .
Lagrange's identity gives The final inequality follows from [F5], with the zero case included.
By [F2] and [F3], . If , then ; conversely, makes , and [F5] forces .
Apply step 1.2 to and use step 1.1: . Both sides of are nonnegative, so uniqueness in [F3] proves multiplicativity.
Hence : if this follows from ; otherwise both quantities are nonnegative, step 1.3 and [F4] give the inequality after squaring.
Expanding with [F1] and [F2], then using step 3.2, gives
Both sides of are nonnegative, so [F4] turns the squared inequality in step 4.1 into the triangle inequality.
Depends on
- Real and imaginary parts, complex conjugation, and modulus
- $\mathbb C=\mathbb R[x]/(x^2+1)$ is a field, every element is uniquely $a+bi$, and every nonzero element has inverse $(a-bi)/(a^2+b^2)$
- The Cauchy-sequence reals have the least-upper-bound property
- Square roots exist: a unique $\sqrt{a} \ge 0$ with $(\sqrt{a})^2 = a$; the positives are $\{x^2 : x \neq 0\}$
- Squaring is monotone on the nonnegatives
- Squares of nonzero elements are positive
Used by
- Buffered certified rational phase approximation Algorithm
- Certified complex-polynomial root isolation in exact algebraic arithmetic Algorithm
- A holomorphic function of constant modulus on a domain is constant Corollary
- exp(x+iy)=eˣ(cos y+i sin y), |exp(x+iy)|=eˣ, and e^iπ+1=0 Corollary
- Orthogonal and unitary operators form groups, and their determinants have modulus one Corollary
- The index of a cycle is locally constant off its trace and vanishes far from it Corollary
- The induced length is a norm Corollary
- The Jacobian determinant of a holomorphic map is |f'|² and is positive exactly where f'≠0 Corollary
- The modulus of a holomorphic function on a closed polydisc is bounded by its supremum on the distinguished boundary Corollary
- The unital algebra generated by a separating complex family and its conjugates is dense Corollary
- A complete domain is necessary for sequential uniform boundedness Counterexample
- A connected complex domain need not be star-shaped Counterexample
- A connected plane domain that is not homologically simply connected Counterexample
- A divergent Blaschke sum: no nonzero Hardy function has these zeros Counterexample
- A holomorphic function on an annulus can have a nonzero closed-contour integral Counterexample
- A nonconstant Blaschke factor has constant boundary modulus Counterexample
- Boundary-scale derivative blowup despite bounded ball data Counterexample
- The complement property is not sufficient for complex phase retrieval Counterexample
- The disc algebra is unital and separating but not self-adjoint or dense Counterexample
- The integers do not have property (T) Counterexample
- Uniform convergence on the closed unit disc does not give a holomorphic extension to a larger disc Counterexample
- z↦|z| is nowhere complex differentiable Counterexample
- z↦|z|² is complex differentiable exactly at 0, with derivative 0, but is holomorphic on no neighbourhood of 0 Counterexample
- zⁿ tends locally uniformly to zero on the unit disc but not uniformly on the closed disc Counterexample
- Balls, polydiscs and the distinguished boundary in ℂᵐ Definition
- Blaschke factors and Blaschke products Definition
- Chebyshev constant of a compact planar set Definition
- Complex L^∞ space of a locally compact group Definition
- Direct integral of a measurable Hilbert field Definition
- Fekete points and the transfinite diameter of a compact set Definition
- Filled complex triangles, their oriented three-edge boundary contours, diameter, and perimeter Definition
- Finite complex-array norms used by the NUFFT certificates Definition
- Fourier coefficients and trigonometric polynomials on the torus Definition
- Left-invariant means on L^∞ of a locally compact group Definition
- Measurable and decomposable operator fields Definition
- Measurable Beltrami coefficients and measurable conformal structures Definition
- Positive definite functions on an abelian group Definition
- Self-adjoint complex function algebras, unitality, and point separation Definition
- Square-summable families on an arbitrary index set and the space ℓ²(I) Definition
- The counting inner product on ℂ^ℤ/Nℤ Definition
…and 251 more results.
Dependency tree · two levels
23 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. Lebl, Basic Analysis I: Complex Numbers and the Complex Exponential (standard reference, not scraped)