How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Conjugation is an involutive real-field automorphism, , and modulus is definite, multiplicative, and subadditive
Statement
Complex conjugation is a real-field automorphism satisfying For every ,
Facts & Assumptions
Given: and .
Complex numbers have unique real coordinates and the coordinate addition and multiplication formulas ( is a field, every element is uniquely , and every nonzero element has inverse ).
Conjugation and modulus are defined by and (Real and imaginary parts, complex conjugation, and modulus).
The real numbers are a complete ordered field (The Cauchy-sequence reals have the least-upper-bound property), and every nonnegative element of a complete ordered field has a unique nonnegative square root (Square roots exist: a unique with ; the positives are ).
For nonnegative elements of an ordered field, if and only if (Squaring is monotone on the nonnegatives).
The square of every nonzero element of an ordered field is positive (Squares of nonzero elements are positive).
Proof
Coordinate expansion using [F1] and [F2] proves the two homomorphism laws, that conjugation fixes every real number, and that applying it twice is the identity. Thus conjugation is an involutive real-field automorphism.
Direct multiplication gives .
Lagrange's identity gives The final inequality follows from [F5], with the zero case included.
By [F2] and [F3], . If , then ; conversely, makes , and [F5] forces .
Apply step 1.2 to and use step 1.1: . Both sides of are nonnegative, so uniqueness in [F3] proves multiplicativity.
Hence : if this follows from ; otherwise both quantities are nonnegative, step 1.3 and [F4] give the inequality after squaring.
Expanding with [F1] and [F2], then using step 3.2, gives
Both sides of are nonnegative, so [F4] turns the squared inequality in step 4.1 into the triangle inequality.
Depends on
- Real and imaginary parts, complex conjugation, and modulus
- $\mathbb C=\mathbb R[x]/(x^2+1)$ is a field, every element is uniquely $a+bi$, and every nonzero element has inverse $(a-bi)/(a^2+b^2)$
- The Cauchy-sequence reals have the least-upper-bound property
- Square roots exist: a unique $\sqrt{a} \ge 0$ with $(\sqrt{a})^2 = a$; the positives are $\{x^2 : x \neq 0\}$
- Squaring is monotone on the nonnegatives
- Squares of nonzero elements are positive
Used by
- A holomorphic function of constant modulus on a domain is constant Corollary
- exp(x+iy)=eˣ(cos y+i sin y), |exp(x+iy)|=eˣ, and e^iπ+1=0 Corollary
- Orthogonal and unitary operators form groups, and their determinants have modulus one Corollary
- The index of a cycle is locally constant off its trace and vanishes far from it Corollary
- The induced length is a norm Corollary
- The Jacobian determinant of a holomorphic map is |f'|² and is positive exactly where f'≠0 Corollary
- The modulus of a holomorphic function on a closed polydisc is bounded by its supremum on the distinguished boundary Corollary
- The unital algebra generated by a separating complex family and its conjugates is dense Corollary
- A complete domain is necessary for sequential uniform boundedness Counterexample
- A connected complex domain need not be star-shaped Counterexample
- A connected plane domain that is not homologically simply connected Counterexample
- A holomorphic function on an annulus can have a nonzero closed-contour integral Counterexample
- A nonconstant Blaschke factor has constant boundary modulus Counterexample
- The disc algebra is unital and separating but not self-adjoint or dense Counterexample
- Uniform convergence on the closed unit disc does not give a holomorphic extension to a larger disc Counterexample
- z↦|z| is nowhere complex differentiable Counterexample
- z↦|z|² is complex differentiable exactly at 0, with derivative 0, but is holomorphic on no neighbourhood of 0 Counterexample
- zⁿ tends locally uniformly to zero on the unit disc but not uniformly on the closed disc Counterexample
- Balls, polydiscs and the distinguished boundary in ℂᵐ Definition
- Filled complex triangles, their oriented three-edge boundary contours, diameter, and perimeter Definition
- Fourier coefficients and trigonometric polynomials on the torus Definition
- Self-adjoint complex function algebras, unitality, and point separation Definition
- Square-summable families on an arbitrary index set and the space ℓ²(I) Definition
- The Frobenius norm ‖ A‖_F=(∑_i,j|aᵢⱼ|²)^1/2 on real or complex matrices Definition
- {1+i, 1-i} is a normal basis of ℂ/ℝ while {1,i} is not Example
- A disjoint two-circle cycle has indices +1 and -1 in its two components Example
- An exact polynomial bound from the boundary maximum principle Example
- Conjugate phases norm a three-atom function Example
- Continuous kernel integral operator is compact on c of an interval Example
- Coordinate functionals give an explicit uniform separating gap Example
- Coordinate partial sums on c₀ Example
- Coordinate vectors converge weakly to zero in ell p Example
- Every cycle in a round annulus has one period, that of the central circle Example
- Fredholm alternative for an integral equation Example
- Gram–Schmidt on an explicit basis of ℂ² with conjugation visible Example
- ML bounds for rational integrands on a semicircular arc and a line segment Example
- Morera proves holomorphy of z↦∫₀¹ tᶻ dt on Rez>1 Example
- Right shift powers converge in wot not sot Example
- The complex geometric power series has radius 1 and sums to 1/(1-z) for |z|<1 Example
- The Frobenius inner product on a real or complex matrix space Example
…and 83 more results.
Dependency tree · two levels
22 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. Lebl, Basic Analysis I: Complex Numbers and the Complex Exponential (standard reference, not scraped)