Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Fredholm alternative for an integral equation

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let a<b be reals, let K be R or C, let k:[a,b]×[a,b]→K be continuous (Continuity of f:A→R at a point of A and on A: the ε-δ condition, its agreement with lim⁡x→cf(x)=f(c) at a limit point, and continuity at an isolated point, Continuity of a map of topological spaces at a point and globally) and let g∈C([a,b],K). Write

(Kf)(x):=∫abk(x,y)f(y) dy,

a compact operator on the Banach space C([a,b],K) with the supremum norm (Continuous kernel integral operator is compact on c of an interval, Banach space), and let K∗ be its transpose on the dual C([a,b],K)∗ (The transpose of a bounded operator). Then:

  1. the equation f−Kf=g has a solution f∈C([a,b],K) if and only if φ(g)=0 for every φ∈ker⁡(I−K∗);
  2. the equation has exactly one solution for every g if and only if the homogeneous equation f=Kf has only the solution f=0.

Facts & Assumptions

[A2]

On C([a,b],K) the supremum norm ∥f∥∞=sup⁡x∣f(x)∣ makes it a normed space, using the real definition when K=R and the complex norm definition when K=C (A norm on a real vector space, the induced metric, and the dictionary with the metric axioms, Complex norm and complex normed space); for complex-valued functions ∣f∣≤∣Re⁡f∣+∣Im⁡f∣ and both parts are bounded by ∣f∣ (Conjugation is an involutive real-field automorphism, zz‾=∣z∣2, and modulus is definite, multiplicative, and subadditive, Real and imaginary parts, complex conjugation, and modulus); a metric space is complete when every Cauchy sequence converges (Complete metric space: every Cauchy sequence converges in the space, Metric space: d(x,y)=0 iff x=y, symmetry, and the triangle inequality; pseudometric and ultrametric).

[A3]

K is a compact operator on C([a,b],K) (Continuous kernel integral operator is compact on c of an interval), and K is a Banach space by finite-dimensional completeness (Every finite-dimensional normed space is Banach, Banach space); A∗=I−K∗ for A=I−K (Transposition reverses composition, The transpose of a bounded operator).

[A4]

Assume AC. For a compact operator C on a Banach space X, the operator I−C is injective if and only if it is surjective, and then boundedly invertible; and for y∈X the equation (I−C)x=y is solvable exactly when φ(y)=0 for every φ in the kernel of the transpose (Fredholm alternative for identity minus compact); the implications are the statement of the alternative, and AC supplies ACω and DC (AC supplies the countable and dependent choices used in Banach integration, The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an N-indexed chain).

Verification

technique · direct

Given: AC, reals a<b, K∈{R,C}, a continuous kernel k on [a,b]2, the integral operator K on C([a,b],K) with the supremum norm, its transpose K∗, and g∈C([a,b],K).

1.1A1A2

C([a,b],R) with the supremum norm is a Banach space, being complete by [A1] and normed by [A2].

1.2A2algebra

C([a,b],C) with the supremum norm is a Banach space: a sequence (fj) is Cauchy for the supremum norm exactly when the real sequences (Re⁡fj) and (Im⁡fj) are Cauchy, by the two inequalities of [A2]; those have continuous limits u,v by [A1], and then ∥fj−(u+iv)∥∞≤∥Re⁡fj−u∥∞+∥Im⁡fj−v∥∞→0; the norm axioms hold by [A2].

1.3A3

The transpose of I−K is I−K∗, by [A3].

2.1step 1.1step 1.2A3

In either scalar field, K is a compact operator on the Banach space C([a,b],K), by [step 1.1], [step 1.2] and [A3].

3.1step 2.1step 1.3A4

Claim 1: by [A4] applied to the compact operator K on the Banach space C([a,b],K), the equation f−Kf=g is solvable exactly when φ(g)=0 for every φ in the kernel of (I−K)∗, which is ker⁡(I−K∗) by [step 1.3].

3.2step 2.1A4

Claim 2: the equation f−Kf=g has exactly one solution for every g exactly when I−K is a bijection, which by [A4] is equivalent to injectivity of I−K, that is, to the homogeneous equation f=Kf having only the zero solution.

4.1step 3.1step 3.2∎

The two displayed claims are [step 3.1] and [step 3.2].

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

123 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources