How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Transposition reverses composition
Statement
Let or . For bounded linear , between normed spaces, For bounded linear and , .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The spaces, maps, scalar field, and hypotheses in the statement above. All duals consist of linear functionals over the ambient field; evaluation has no conjugation.
From The transpose of a bounded operator, with its stated hypotheses: Let or . Let be bounded and linear between normed spaces. Its transpose, or Banach adjoint, is The duals are def-dual-space-of-a-normed-space. Composition is bounded by lem-composition-operator-norm-inequality, so this has the displayed codomain. It is linear in over . No complex conjugation is inserted; a Hilbert adjoint uses a separate inner-product identification.
Proof
For every and , . Equality on every and then every proves the first operator identity with domain and codomain .
For , . For , . These identities also hold for zero maps, zero scalars, and zero spaces.
Depends on
Used by
- Invertibility and the inverse of the transpose Corollary
- The dual construction reverses arrows Counterexample
Dependency tree · two levels
3 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Bühler–Salamon, Functional Analysis, Lemma 4.3(i), p.173 (standard reference, not scraped)