Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (deepseek-v4-pro + gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-26
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A disjoint two-circle cycle has indices +1 and −1 in its two components

Example

Let γ1(t)=−1+12exp⁡(it) and γ2(t)=1+12exp⁡(−it) for t∈[0,2π], and let Γ be the complex chain ((1,γ1),(1,γ2)). Then Γ is a cycle whose trace is the disjoint union of the two circles {∣z+1∣=12} and {∣z−1∣=12}, and for z off that trace

n(Γ,z)={+1,∣z+1∣<12,−1,∣z−1∣<12,0,∣z+1∣>12 and ∣z−1∣>12.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The contours γ1,γ2 above and the chain Γ=((1,γ1),(1,γ2)).

[L1]

The trace of a sum of chains is the union of their traces; a sum of cycles is a cycle; and for p off the traces involved, n(Γ1+Γ2,p)=n(Γ1,p)+n(Γ2,p) (Chain integration and the index are additive in the chain, and reverse with it).

[L2]

For a∈C, r>0 and k∈Z, the contour γk(t)=a+rexp⁡(ikt) on [0,2π] is a closed complex contour with n(γk,z)=k for ∣z−a∣<r and n(γk,z)=0 for ∣z−a∣>r; for k≠0 its trace is {z:∣z−a∣=r} (A circle traversed k times has winding number k inside and 0 outside).

[L3]

A complex chain is a finite list of pairs (mk,γk); a list of closed contours is a cycle; and a single closed contour with coefficient 1 is a cycle whose trace is the trace of that contour (Complex chains, their traces, and cycles).

[L4]

n(Γ,p)=(2πi)−1∫Γdz/(z−p), and for a single closed contour with coefficient 1 this is the winding number of that contour (Integration over a complex chain and the index of a chain).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1givenL2

By [L2] with a=−1, r=12, k=1 the contour γ1 is closed with trace {∣z+1∣=12}, n(γ1,z)=1 for ∣z+1∣<12 and n(γ1,z)=0 for ∣z+1∣>12; by [L2] with a=1, r=12, k=−1 the contour γ2 is closed with trace {∣z−1∣=12}, n(γ2,z)=−1 for ∣z−1∣<12 and n(γ2,z)=0 for ∣z−1∣>12.

1.2L5

The two circles are disjoint: if ∣z+1∣≤12 and ∣z−1∣≤12 then 2=∣(z+1)−(z−1)∣≤∣z+1∣+∣z−1∣≤1 by [L5], which is false.

2.1step 1.1step 1.2L1L3

Both contours are closed, so Γ is a cycle by [L3], and by [L1] and [L3] its trace is the union of the two circles, which is disjoint by step 1.2.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1L1L4∎

For z off that trace, [L1] and [L4] give n(Γ,z)=n(γ1,z)+n(γ2,z); with step 1.1 this is 1+0=1 when ∣z+1∣<12, which forces ∣z−1∣>12 by step 1.2, and 0+(−1)=−1 when ∣z−1∣<12, and 0+0=0 when both moduli exceed 12.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

52 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources