How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A disjoint two-circle cycle has indices and in its two components
Example
Let and for , and let be the complex chain . Then is a cycle whose trace is the disjoint union of the two circles and , and for off that trace
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The contours above and the chain .
The trace of a sum of chains is the union of their traces; a sum of cycles is a cycle; and for off the traces involved, (Chain integration and the index are additive in the chain, and reverse with it).
For , and , the contour on is a closed complex contour with for and for ; for its trace is (A circle traversed times has winding number inside and outside).
A complex chain is a finite list of pairs ; a list of closed contours is a cycle; and a single closed contour with coefficient is a cycle whose trace is the trace of that contour (Complex chains, their traces, and cycles).
, and for a single closed contour with coefficient this is the winding number of that contour (Integration over a complex chain and the index of a chain).
Verification
By [L2] with , , the contour is closed with trace , for and for ; by [L2] with , , the contour is closed with trace , for and for .
The two circles are disjoint: if and then by [L5], which is false.
Both contours are closed, so is a cycle by [L3], and by [L1] and [L3] its trace is the union of the two circles, which is disjoint by step 1.2.
For off that trace, [L1] and [L4] give ; with step 1.1 this is when , which forces by step 1.2, and when , and when both moduli exceed .
Depends on
- Chain integration and the index are additive in the chain, and reverse with it
- A circle traversed $k$ times has winding number $k$ inside and $0$ outside
- Complex chains, their traces, and cycles
- Integration over a complex chain and the index of a chain
- Conjugation is an involutive real-field automorphism, $z\overline z=|z|^2$, and modulus is definite, multiplicative, and subadditive
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
52 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- L. V. Ahlfors, Complex Analysis, 3rd ed., Ch. 4 §2.1 (standard reference, not scraped)