How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Chosen limits and colimits are adjoint to the diagonal functor
Statement
Let be small and let be the diagonal functor.
- If a limiting cone is supplied for every , the resulting limit functor satisfies .
- If a colimiting cocone is supplied for every such , the resulting colimit functor satisfies .
The choices are part of the hypotheses.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The small category and the supplied choices in the Statement.
Chosen limiting or colimiting cones for every diagram assemble into limit or colimit functors (Chosen limits and colimits of a fixed small shape assemble into limit and colimit functors).
A limit is a terminal cone and a colimit is an initial cocone (Limits and colimits as terminal cones and initial cocones, with existence and uniqueness in their universal properties).
Morphisms in a functor category are natural transformations (Functor category ).
Proof
By [F1], the supplied limiting cones define a functor .
A morphism is, by [F2], uniquely equivalent to a cone from to ; by [F3], such a cone is exactly a natural transformation .
Dually, supplied colimits assemble by [F1], and [F2] with [F3] make a morphism uniquely equivalent to a cocone .
The correspondence in step 1.2 is natural in and because postcomposition of a mediating map and transport of a cone along a natural transformation preserve the defining cone equations. Hence .
Reading step 2.1 in the opposite categories gives the corresponding check for step 1.3: the cocone correspondence is natural in and because precomposition of a mediating map and transport of a cocone along a natural transformation preserve the defining cocone equations. Hence .
Both constructions begin with supplied objectwise choices; no selection is inferred from bare existence.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 25 results over 11 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Emily Riehl, Category Theory in Context, 2nd ed., Proposition 4.6.1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Tom Leinster, Basic Category Theory, Section 5.1 (standard reference, not scraped)