Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-08-13 rests on unproved material (inherited)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Rests on 3 statements not proved in this library, by way of the results it cites. This item cites no such statement directly; it depends on results that do. The unproved premises it inherits are Cohen's first model: an infinite Dedekind-finite set of reals, Sierpiński 1947: the generalised continuum hypothesis implies the Axiom of Choice and The continuum hypothesis and its generalisation are independent of ZFC. Each is recorded with a citation to the literature and is not established here, because the track that would prove it has not yet been developed in this library. Everything else in this proof is proved here.

Chosen limits and colimits of a fixed small shape assemble into limit and colimit functors

Statement

Let J be small. If a particular limiting cone is chosen for every D:JC, these choices define a functor

limJ:[J,C]C.

Chosen colimiting cocones similarly define colimJ:[J,C]C.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A small J and, for every D, a chosen limit (LD,λD).

[F1]

Objects and arrows of a functor category are functors and natural transformations (Functor category [C,D], Natural transformation and its components).

[F3]

Smallness is cardinality of the indexing category (Assuming Choice, cardinality of a small category and κ-small diagrams).

Proof

technique · universal property
1.1

For α:DE, the family αjλjD:LDE(j) is a cone: for u:jk, naturality of α and the cone equation give E(u)αjλjD=αkD(u)λjD=αkλkD.

F1F2
2.1

By [F2], there is a unique morphism limα:LDLE satisfying λjElimα=αjλjD for every j.

F2step 1.1
3.1

For 1D, both lim(1D) and 1LD have the same composites with all λjD; [L1] gives lim(1D)=1LD.

L1step 2.1
3.2

For DαEβH, the maps lim(βα) and (limβ)(limα) have composite βjαjλjD with every λjH. By [L1] they are equal. Thus the assignments satisfy the functor laws.

L1step 2.1
4.1

The smallness in [F3] ensures that the functor category is used under the library's set-based indexing convention. Reversing every arrow in steps 1.1, 2.1, 3.1, and 3.2 by [L2] gives the chosen-colimit functor.

F3L2step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1step 3.2

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 41 results over 14 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources