How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
For small source and index categories, chosen target limits and colimits compute the corresponding functor-category limits and colimits pointwise
Statement
Let and be small and let . If each diagram has a chosen limit, these limits form a limit of in the functor category. The dual statement holds pointwise for chosen colimits.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The two small categories, the diagram , and a chosen limiting cone at every .
The functor category has functors as objects and natural transformations as morphisms; the small-source hypotheses ensure the stated size control (Functor category , If is small and is locally small then is locally small; if both are small it is small).
A limit is characterized by existence and uniqueness of cone factors (Limits and colimits as terminal cones and initial cocones, with existence and uniqueness in their universal properties).
Chosen limits act functorially on natural transformations (Chosen limits and colimits of a fixed small shape assemble into limit and colimit functors).
Limit legs are jointly monic (The legs of a limiting cone are jointly monic, and the legs of a colimiting cocone are jointly epic).
Colimits are the formal dual (A limiting cone for a diagram is exactly a colimiting cocone for the formally dual diagram in the opposite category).
Choice selects an element from every set in a family of nonempty sets (The Axiom of Choice).
Proof
For , the maps form a natural transformation of -diagrams. By [L1] they induce with .
Given a cone in the functor category, pointwise universality gives a unique with . For , naturality of makes and equal after every ; [L2] makes them equal. Thus the form a natural transformation .
Identity and composition for follow either from [L1] or by composing with every and applying [L2]. Thus is a functor, and the displayed equations say each is natural.
The transformation factors the cone componentwise. Any other factor has the same component at every by pointwise uniqueness, hence equals . By [F2], is a limit in the functor category.
If only existence, rather than chosen limits, is assumed, [F3] selects the pointwise cones over the set of objects of the small category . Reversing the whole construction by [L3] proves the colimit assertion.
Depends on
- Functor category $[\mathcal C,\mathcal D]$
- If $\mathcal C$ is small and $\mathcal D$ is locally small then $[\mathcal C,\mathcal D]$ is locally small; if both are small it is small
- Limits and colimits as terminal cones and initial cocones, with existence and uniqueness in their universal properties
- Chosen limits and colimits of a fixed small shape assemble into limit and colimit functors
- The legs of a limiting cone are jointly monic, and the legs of a colimiting cocone are jointly epic
- A limiting cone for a diagram is exactly a colimiting cocone for the formally dual diagram in the opposite category
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 31 results over 11 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- E. Riehl, Category Theory in Context, Proposition 3.3.1 (standard reference, not scraped)