Finite-Automata Transition and Determinisation Interfaces: Examples
About this page
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
✓ 3 results · all verified · 3 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs; all 3 also cleared it.
1 · Prerequisites
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Countability and Uncountability
- Deterministic Finite Automata and Regular Languages
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Finite-Automata Transition and Determinisation Interfaces
- Formal Languages, Encodings, and Decision Problems
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Linear Recurrences and Rational Generating Functions
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
2 · Logical flowchart
3 · Items
Example
Epsilon closure and word transitions on three states
Example
A complete determinisation table for a three-state epsilon-NFA
Counterexample