How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Finite-sample AdaBoost.M1 with half-log coefficients
Definition
Fix a finite training sample with , , and , a finite round limit , and a weak-learning routine which at each requested round returns a classifier for the current observation weights. Initialize and . At round , compute the weighted error . If , halt and return itself as a perfect classifier with zero training error; do not form an infinite coefficient. If , halt and report that the weak-learning condition failed. For , set
update , and set . After completed weak rounds, return the classifier , where for and for . Thus ties are assigned to . The coefficient convention is the half-log convention; multiplying every coefficient by the same positive factor does not change the sign classifier. The definition makes no claim about test error or generalization.
Used by
Dependency tree · 0 levels
Nothing. This result depends on no other item in the library.
Sources
- Trevor Hastie, Robert Tibshirani, and Jerome Friedman, The Elements of Statistical Learning, 2nd ed., 12th printing (standard reference, not scraped)
- Robert E. Schapire, "The Boosting Approach to Machine Learning: An Overview," MSRI Workshop on Nonlinear Estimation and Classification, 2002 (standard reference, not scraped)