How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Finite McCormick convex relaxation construction for factorable box problems
Definition
Input a bounded factorable optimization problem on a box , its objective DAG , a finite list of inequality-constraint DAGs representing , a finite rule table, a precision , and a dyadic interval format with fixed exponent bounds. For each non-product nonlinear node, the table must supply certified convex and concave graph bounds on its certified operand domain, with proof that they contain the exact graph and that the imposed epigraph/hypograph inequalities form a convex relation. The table must also supply a convex underestimator for the objective DAG's final value, verified to satisfy for every exact input . All domain hypotheses and interval/coefficient enclosures must be certified. For each interval call, pass the same declared precision and format to Outward-rounded interval enclosures for factorable expression DAGs on boxes. Traverse the union of the objective and constraint DAGs in topological order, using a lifted variable for each node. For an affine node, add its exact affine relation. For a product node , add the four McCormick inequalities from McCormick envelope for a bilinear term on a box using certified operand bounds; The four McCormick inequalities give the convex hull of a bilinear graph over a box proves this relation is a convex outer enclosure of the product graph. For every other nonlinear node, add its certified convex and concave graph bounds; if its domain hypotheses, interval bounds, graph containment, or convexity cannot be verified, return unsupported-relaxation or inconclusive. For each constraint DAG, require its final lifted value to be at most zero.
Return the resulting convex feasible region and the certified objective underestimator only when every lifted relation is convex, every original feasible point has its exact node values in the lifted region, and all coefficient enclosures preserve the declared inequalities. These checks make the construction a relaxation of both the objective and all listed constraints in the sense of Certified factorable convex relaxations on a box. Optionally pass this relaxation to a finite convex-bound routine. A dual-feasible pair and a verified lower bound on its Lagrangian dual value produce a dual-certificate record; if no such record is available, return bound-unavailable. The procedure asserts no solver convergence or polynomial running-time bound.
Depends on
- Outward-rounded interval enclosures for factorable expression DAGs on boxes
- Certified factorable convex relaxations on a box
- McCormick envelope for a bilinear term on a box
- Outward-rounded interval, rectangle and ball operations
- The four McCormick inequalities give the convex hull of a bilinear graph over a box
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
12 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Arnold Neumaier, Complete Search in Continuous Global Optimization and Constraint Satisfaction, §§16 and 18 (standard reference, not scraped)
- A. Tsoukalas and A. Mitsos, Multivariate McCormick relaxations, §§4–5 (standard reference, not scraped)