Alphabeta Math
AlgorithmAlgorithm: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Exact-line-search gradient tree boosting on a finite sample

Definition

Fix a finite regression sample (xi,yi)i=1N with N≥1, xi∈Rp for a finite p≥1, and yi∈Y. Let ℓ:Y×R→R be a finite-valued per-observation loss, differentiable in its second argument at every score used. Choose a finite round count M≥0 and finite integer tree-depth cap dmax⁡≥0. The algorithm is admissible only when the following required minima are attained: an initial constant minimizer and, at every round, a line minimizer in each terminal leaf. For any admitted run, choose any one such minimizer at each finite stage.

Initialize f0(x)=c0 with c0∈arg⁡min⁡c∈R∑i=1Nℓ(yi,c). For each round m=1,…,M, perform the following steps.

  1. For each observation compute the negative score derivative rim=−∂2ℓ(yi,fm−1(xi)).

  2. Run finite-depth CART regression-tree growth, using squared error and depth cap dmax⁡, on the responses rim at features xi. Let its nonempty terminal feature regions be R1m,…,RJmm; their training-index sets partition {1,…,N}. This tree fit approximates the unrestricted negative score gradient. Its fitted leaf means are used to determine the regression-tree fit and regions, but are not the boosting update offsets.

  3. For each leaf region choose an attained exact line minimizer γjm∈arg⁡min⁡γ∈R∑i:xi∈Rjmℓ(yi,fm−1(xi)+γ). In particular, zero is an admissible comparison offset.

  4. Update fm(x)=fm−1(x)+∑j=1Jmγjm1{x∈Rjm}.

The output is fM. Because the run has finitely many rounds and finitely many leaves, choosing one attained minimizer at each stage requires no axiom of choice. The defined variant uses the full training sample and exact leafwise line minimization; shrinkage and subsampling are separate variants. This definition asserts no convergence or generalization result.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

12 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources