How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Finite graph-harmonic label propagation with a residual status
Definition
Inputs are , , a matrix , a nonempty labeled subset , a boundary-label matrix with , an operation cap per label coordinate, and a residual tolerance . Use exact real arithmetic in the mathematical specification. Reject with status unless is symmetric, entrywise nonnegative, and zero-diagonal. Set , , , and . The support graph has edge exactly when ; two vertices are in the same connected component exactly when a finite path of support edges joins them. Use increasing vertex order for every submatrix, boundary vector, and returned output coordinate.
Inspect every connected component in increasing vertex order. If some component meeting misses , return status and the unanchored components before forming a solve. If , return , an empty unlabeled output, and status . Otherwise set .
For each column in order, start a fresh counter at zero and form , evaluating the matrix-vector product in increasing vertex order. Recompute a fresh lower-triangular Cholesky factor of for this column by the recurrence: initialize to zero; in increasing order , compute , return status if , set , and for set . Recompute for each column so that the factorization cost is part of that column's cap.
Count each real addition, subtraction, multiplication, division, comparison, and square root as one scalar operation. Evaluate every finite sum left-to-right in increasing index order, with an empty sum equal to zero. For each coordinate of , implement the unary negation as one subtraction from zero and include that subtraction in the count. Input validation, degree/Laplacian construction, component scans, loop-control comparisons, and budget checks are outside the per-column count. The count for column includes forming , its Cholesky recurrence, both triangular substitutions, and its residual calculation. Before each counted operation, if it would make the counter exceed , return status with outputs and residuals for only the fully completed columns before . If a Cholesky pivot satisfies , return status with outputs and residuals for only the fully completed columns before .
Solve by in increasing , and solve by in decreasing , using the same counter and sum convention. Compute in increasing , then , again using the same counter. If , return status with candidate coordinates and residuals through column . If all columns pass, return , the residuals, and status .
Definition references
Graph-harmonic label extension on a finite weighted graph: fixes the finite support graph, boundary data, componentwise anchor condition, and energy.
Anchored graph-harmonic extensions are unique and obey a maximum principle: proves that the anchored principal block is positive definite and gives the exact harmonic solution.
The real Cholesky recurrence computes the positive-diagonal factor: proves the displayed deterministic recurrence returns the real positive-diagonal Cholesky factor for the anchored positive-definite block.
Forward and backward substitution are correct, unique, and quadratic in scalar operations: supplies the unique triangular substitutions used to solve each column.
Chapelle, Schölkopf, and Zien, Semi-Supervised Learning, Chapter 11 §§11.2–11.3
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
11 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Xiaojin Zhu, Zoubin Ghahramani, and John Lafferty, Semi-Supervised Learning Using Gaussian Fields and Harmonic Functions, ICML 2003 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Olivier Chapelle, Bernhard Schölkopf, and Alexander Zien (editors), Semi-Supervised Learning, MIT Press, 2006 (standard reference, not scraped)