How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Reparameterized variational training
Definition
Inputs are a fixed nonempty finite data set ; a VAE model and admissible encoder from the preceding definition; a parameter-independent base law and pathwise map for every ; an initial parameter ; a finite positive integer ; and positive learning rates . Require the hypotheses of the dominated pathwise-gradient theorem at every parameter value reached by the procedure, and require each update below to remain in its open admissible parameter domain. Let be the union of the theorem's common null set for finite positive log values and its null set on which the sample-path condition may fail; thus is a common -null set for all data indices and parameter values.
Set . For each :
- Draw uniformly from and draw from , with and independent and the pair independent of all earlier random draws.
- If , set . Otherwise set and evaluate
- If , set . Otherwise, holding and fixed, compute the Euclidean gradient
- Update .
Return and . This finite procedure specifies stochastic ascent on the finite-average ELBO; it makes no claim that the iterates converge or reach a global maximum.
Definition references
Remarks
At a fixed current parameter satisfying the gradient theorem's hypotheses, a fresh independent draw has the unbiased pathwise-gradient and finite-coordinate-variance guarantees proved there. In round , this is a conditional guarantee given the preceding draws, which fix ; no unconditional finite-variance claim over the random trajectory is made. The Axiom of Choice identifies this ELBO as a lower bound on log evidence under the corollary's hypotheses.
If the prior and encoder are Gaussian and the expectation of their log-density difference is available analytically, that term can be evaluated exactly instead of sampled. This removes Monte Carlo variation from that term only; the decoder log-likelihood may still be sampled, and no universal variance or training guarantee follows.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Diederik P. Kingma and Max Welling, Auto-Encoding Variational Bayes, arXiv:1312.6114v1 (standard reference, not scraped)