Alphabeta Math
AlgorithmAlgorithm: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite-sum SVRG

Definition

Let n,d>=1 and let f_1,...,f_n:R^d->R be continuously differentiable convex functions. Define the finite-sum objective

F(x)=1n∑i=1nfi(x),∇F(x)=1n∑i=1n∇fi(x),

where the gradient identity follows from Gradient of a finite sum is the finite sum of gradients and the sums use Finite sums and finite products, by recursion. Suppose each component gradient is L-Lipschitz for a common L>0. An SVRG epoch with snapshot \tilde x and inner length m>=1 is:

  1. Compute the full gradient \nabla F(\tilde x), set x_0=\tilde x.
  2. For t=0,...,m-1, draw I_t uniformly from {1,...,n}, independently of the past, and set vt=∇fIt(xt)−∇fIt(x~)+∇F(x~),xt+1=xt−ηvt for a selected step size \eta>0.
  3. Independently draw J uniformly from {0,...,m-1} and return x_J as the next snapshot.

The displayed procedure evaluates the snapshot component gradient at every inner update rather than caching those values. Coordinatewise at a fixed pre-update history, its correction has the one-sample scalar form of Control-variate estimators: the uniform index is the production draw, the integrand is the current component-gradient coordinate, the control is its snapshot coordinate, the known control mean is the corresponding full snapshot-gradient coordinate, and the coefficient is one; the conditional properties needed here are proved in local results on this page. Conditional-expectation notation inherits the The Axiom of Choice assumption from Filtration-adapted stochastic-gradient oracles and Robbins–Monro updates.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

32 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources