How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A map whose critical values have positive measure
Statement refuted
False claim: every map has critical values of measure zero.
Whitney's classical construction gives a map whose critical values contain a set of positive measure. That source-backed phenomenon is the concrete counterexample behind Sard's theorem does not hold for every map; this item records the example honestly without pretending to reconstruct Whitney's construction inside the current page.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
2 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Encyclopedia of Mathematics, Sard theorem (standard reference, not scraped)
- John M. Lee, Introduction to Smooth Manifolds, 2nd ed. (standard reference, not scraped)