How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The reflection complement in is not normal
Statement refuted
A complement to the normal factor in a semidirect product must itself be normal.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: .
For the dihedral group is of order , and every element has a unique form or with ; at this is the dihedral group of order six ( with inversion action has order and the dihedral relations).
The canonical complement is normal exactly when the defining action is trivial (The canonical semidirect decomposition is an internal direct product if and only if the defining action is trivial).
Counterexample
The subgroup is the canonical complement to . The inversion action on is nontrivial because .
Therefore is not normal by [L2]. Explicitly, , which is not in by the uniqueness in [L1].
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Keith Conrad, Semidirect Products (standard reference, not scraped)