How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A function can have measurable level sets without being measurable
Statement refuted
That measurability of every level set is enough to make measurable.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice, the Lebesgue measurable space , a Vitali set , and the function defined by for , for .
Assuming the Axiom of Choice, Vitali sets exist and are not Lebesgue measurable. (Assuming choice on the cosets of in , a Vitali set in exists, Assuming the Axiom of Choice, a Vitali set is not Lebesgue measurable)
Counterexample
Every level set of is empty, a singleton, or a two-point set, so every [given] level set is measurable.
Yet , and [L1] says that is not measurable. Therefore [step 1.1, L1] is not measurable.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
11 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Sheldon Axler, Measure, Integration and Real Analysis, Exercise 29 (standard reference, not scraped)