How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A vector field with no pullback under a noninjective map
Statement refuted
False claim: for every smooth map and vector field on , there is a vector field on satisfying for every .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The constant map , , and the constant vector field on .
A general mixed tensor field does not have a pullback by every smooth map (A general mixed tensor field does not have a pullback by every smooth map).
Counterexample
The map is noninjective and has differential for every .
A vector field as in the false claim would satisfy at each point. Step 1.1 makes that impossible, because for every , whereas .
Hence has no pullback along , giving the announced counterexample and agreeing with [L1].
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
2 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Will J. Merry, Differential Geometry (standard reference, not scraped)