How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The encoding is effective but not prefix-free
Statement refuted
The statement "every effective binary encoding is prefix-free" is false.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The encoding on binary words.
The statement refuted is: every effective binary encoding is prefix-free.
An effective binary encoding is an injective map into with a total decoder, and prefix-free means that no codeword is a proper prefix of another, by Effective binary encodings and total decoders.
Counterexample
The map is effective: define a total decoder by removing the first bit from any binary word beginning with , and sending every binary word not beginning with (including the empty word) to the fixed malformed token. Then the decoder recovers from .
The codeword is a proper prefix of , so is not prefix-free.
Therefore is a counterexample to [A1].
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Michael Sipser, MIT 18.404J Theory of Computation, Lecture 7 (standard reference, not scraped)